Asrock H470 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H470 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200429
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 12:05
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 745
72% 595 Pts
64-Core 981
61% 981 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 49.1
33% 42.5 fps
MRender 52.2
Gravity 46.3
Splatting 36.8
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1055 818 802 810 821 815 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,407
Write 2,020
Mixed 1,615
SusWrite 854
385% 1724 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 80.2
268% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,034
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 878
651% 868 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 270%
Great: 346%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
18GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 104 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 464
Write 109
Mixed 151
SusWrite 108
45% 208 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 16.4
101% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 41.3
50% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
303GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 97 99 109 102 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 122
Write 112
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 102
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 77%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
158GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 103
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
298GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 82.1
Write 85.3
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 89.6
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 029E CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 8502 3200 C16 Series 029E CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 27.1
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H470 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock H470 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback