| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Pcchips P65G (all builds) |
| Motherboard | PCCHIPS P65G |
| Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111018 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 10 '22 at 18:59 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.6%
Very good
|
66% 109 Pts
|
42% 311 Pts
|
18% 298 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.5%
Below average
|
34% 41.8 fps
|
30% 37.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 80 57 11 16 31 MB/s
|
27.9%
Poor
|
37% 164 MB/s
|
48% 14.3 MB/s
|
12% 15.4 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
40GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 155 155 156 148 MB/s
|
65%
Good
|
38% 168 MB/s
|
128% 39.7 MB/s
|
175% 206 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
51.9%
Above average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P65G Builds (Compare 24 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Pcchips P65G
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2310Intel $90Bench 65%, 15,623 samples | 5x |
| Pentium G645Intel $70Bench 50%, 5,700 samples | 4x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 5x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $159 |