GAME SLAYER XL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGAME SLAYER XL  (all builds)
MotherboardGAME XL
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 13:21
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 306
93% 177 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 876
88% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 83.3
Parallax 6.1
4% 31.5 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.1
6% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,082
Write 1,755
Mixed 1,762
416% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 89.1
329% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,442
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 1,081
854% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16S4B.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 15.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SLAYER XL Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: GAME SLAYER XL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback