PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970DE3/U3S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120731 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 07 '22 at 21:29 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 286 293 292 299 297 MB/s
|
79.2%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST3500411SV 500GB
266GB free
Firmware: CV15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 98 99 100 100 MB/s
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6350 Six-CoreAMD $100Bench 59%, 29,222 samples | 8x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 8x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 11x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
RX 460AMD $90Bench 20%, 64,240 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $308 |