Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1800 187 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 45.8 1-Core 14.5 2-Core 38 23% 32.8 Pts	4-Core 30.2 8-Core 42.6 5% 36.4 Pts	64-Core 38.5 2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 7ED4) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.43 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TN 120GB 120GB 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0822A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 41 50 31 46 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.6% Below average	Read 230 Write 118 Mixed 52 SusWrite 52.5 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 13.6 61% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 2.3 18% 45.5 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5428-058.A00LF 1x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11% Very poor	MC Read 0.6 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.5 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J1800IntelBench 30%, 187 samples	32x
Celeron J1800IntelBench 30%, 5,848 samples	11x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	43x

RAM
MS3512NSZ-CA3G1 1x4GBUnknownBench 21%, 530 samples	21x
SH564128FH8NZQNSCR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 173 samples	3x
MS301GNSA-CA3G1 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 112 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16