HP 870-124no

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 870-124no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160912
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 19:38
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 98
2-Core 191
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 568
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
HP(103C 82FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 137
Parallax 127
103% 130 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-128G-1006 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 86 41 68 45 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 398
Write 169
Mixed 162
SusWrite 65.1
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 24.3
82% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 197
164% 241 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 91%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
35GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 130 133 187 177 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.6% Good
Read 280
Write 95.2
Mixed 155
SusWrite 165
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 28.2
89% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 186
160% 231 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 85%
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
42GB free
Firmware: X4120101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 184 185 114 77 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 431
Write 401
Mixed 205
SusWrite 141
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 35.7
109% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 216
177% 255 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
846GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 171 175 173 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 186
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 174
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 137 138 136 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 83
SusWrite 136
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-124no Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: HP 870-124no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback