HP 870-124no

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 870-124no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160912
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 14:03
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 504
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
HP(103C 82FA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 129
Parallax 118
96% 122 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 124
Splatting 106
90% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-128G-1006 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 76 47 71 47 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 408
Write 141
Mixed 237
SusWrite 59.6
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 25
88% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 174
155% 237 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 91%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
35GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 130 131 237 131 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 188
Write 84.8
Mixed 161
SusWrite 166
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 25.1
88% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 185
154% 217 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 85%
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
42GB free
Firmware: X4120101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 180 98 76 71 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 406
Write 409
Mixed 301
SusWrite 124
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 34.6
118% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 218
182% 265 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
846GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 157 150 170 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 174
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 154
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 137 138 137 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 136
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-124no Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: HP 870-124no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback