Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 116% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 24 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '22 at 00:01
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10600K-$125 70,951 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 83.4 1-Core 145 2-Core 264 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 535 8-Core 865 86% 700 Pts	64-Core 1,095 68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	141% Outstanding	Lighting 204 Reflection 192 Parallax 184 167% 194 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 144 Splatting 126 121% 151 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 232 155 157 157 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 399 Write 478 Mixed 351 SusWrite 211 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 38 131% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 348 260% 345 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 133%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 127 122 121 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 153 Write 104 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 123 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/8G 16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.5% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 14.9 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,067x
Core i5-10600KIntel $125Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	512x
Core i9-10850KIntel $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	253x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	505x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	388x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	256x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	137x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $145Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	112x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	102x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16