| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H170M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151110 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 03 '22 at 15:38 |
| Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.6%
Good
|
58% 103 Pts
|
31% 260 Pts
|
20% 328 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.4%
Average
|
49% 64 fps
|
50% 61.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 276 274 144 149 104 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
69% 311 MB/s
|
95% 35.7 MB/s
|
114% 226 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD252KJ 250GB
206GB free
Firmware: CM100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 80 82 82 82 MB/s
|
41.9%
Average
|
53% 72.1 MB/s
|
127% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.8%
Below average
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
17% 6.07 GB/s
|
60% 66.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H170M Pro4 Builds (Compare 318 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H170M Pro4 - $118
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 69x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 55x |
| Core i5-6600Intel $123Bench 68%, 80,688 samples | 40x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 30x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 29x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $326 |