Toshiba Satellite C850-BMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C850-BMK  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 11:08
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 126
59% 95 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 66 34 40 35 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 126
SusWrite 51.7
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 22.9
92% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 97.4
DQ Mixed 45
49% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
207GB free
Firmware: ES2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 57 75 69 63 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 74.8
Write 59.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 68.2
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C850-BMK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C850-BMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback