Toshiba Satellite Pro C850D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite Pro C850D (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Renmore
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120412
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '17 at 21:53
Run Duration	492 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	30.5% Below average	Memory 57.7 1-Core 11.2 2-Core 12.6 23% 27.2 Pts	4-Core 22.1 8-Core 24 3% 23 Pts	64-Core 10.8 1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FB33) 384MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.21 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127 6,562 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2127 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9591 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 2598 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1370 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 143 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 196 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 13580 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044315176 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 4185 (DE) Loaded hours 95 95 2136 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 317 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	40.3% Average	Read 62.8 Write 77.7 Mixed 75.3 54% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.17 58% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 47%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.38% Terrible	Read 13.6 Write 2.33 Mixed 3.75 6% 6.55 MB/s	4K Read 3.76 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 14% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.38% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.77% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 1.5 MC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.77% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Toshiba Satellite Pro C850D

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)