Toshiba Satellite C850-BMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 26% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C850-BMK  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 11:22
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 26%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 56.4
36% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 82.2
11% 82.3 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 105 50 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 437
Write 350
Mixed 343
SusWrite 106
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 25.5
109% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 46.8
92% 180 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
15GB free
Firmware: ES2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 81 81 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 82.8
Write 79.9
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 81.4
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C850-BMK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C850-BMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback