___________________ ___________________

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System___________________ ___________________  (all builds)
Motherboard_____________________ _______________________
Memory33.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 08:30
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Not Available
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,047
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 165
Parallax 110
96% 131 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 101
Splatting 90.7
87% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 234 212 199 194 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 473
Write 232
Mixed 285
SusWrite 208
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 36.4
136% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 231
197% 290 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZR F4-3200C16-16GTZR Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ___________________ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: ___________________ ___________________

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback