Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAY_S512FA

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAY_S512FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FAY
Memory	5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '22 at 18:36
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 209 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 502 50% 409 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 130F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	4.48% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 8.1 5% 5.97 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 0.3 3% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.48% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB 7,536 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.T SusWrite @10s intervals: 502 197 220 217 220 202 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 628 Write 647 Mixed 277 SusWrite 260 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 23.5 101% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 410 DQ Write 478 DQ Mixed 578 398% 489 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 3200 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.2% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 13.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAY_S512FA Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAY_S512FA

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	9x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	6x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	15x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	14x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	1x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBHynixBench 56%, 4,116 samples	7x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	5x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 20GBSamsungBench 49%, 29 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16