Asus K54C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus K54C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K54C
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 10:57
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 87.7
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 112
55% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 146
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 13C7) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2559
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 411 421 361 377 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 418
Write 380
Mixed 344
SusWrite 386
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 29.9
101% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 288
238% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88%
Great: 125%
SD Card 128GB
28GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 17
Write 14.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 16.7
22% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
160% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8C26 TIMETEC-SD3-1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K54C Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K54C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback