Asus K54C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K54C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K54C
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 10:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 56
2-Core 90.3
51% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 131
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 13C7) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2559
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 352 394 354 350 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 392
Write 366
Mixed 328
SusWrite 359
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 25.5
85% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 290
238% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 125%
SD Card 128GB
28GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 17
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 16.7
23% 17 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.4
156% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8C26 TIMETEC-SD3-1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K54C Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K54C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback