Asus K54C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus K54C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K54C
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 95.7
47% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 129
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 13C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 373 390 388 374 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 442
Write 399
Mixed 377
SusWrite 371
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 29.2
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 191
153% 217 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 125%
SDXC Card 128GB
24GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 16.4
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 16.7
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.8
180% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8C26 TIMETEC-SD3-1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K54C Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K54C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback