User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-T8D
Memory61.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 10:33
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 662
59% 501 Pts
64-Core 2,665
165% 2,665 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.84
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 12.1
10% 11.8 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 12.7
11% 13 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 437 435 436 435 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 402
Mixed 414
SusWrite 442
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 39.4
121% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 317
232% 303 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 313%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
222GB free
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 142 132 132 140 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 425
Write 253
Mixed 276
SusWrite 170
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 14.3
67% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 32.6
44% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52%
Great: 55%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75
189GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1894 1023 136 102 102 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,228
Write 867
Mixed 1,434
SusWrite 563
230% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 69.1
238% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 625
456% 598 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 183%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0-CMA4 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 15.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback