User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-T8D
Memory61.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 10:28
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 152
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 635
58% 488 Pts
64-Core 2,664
165% 2,664 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.84
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 11.7
10% 11.8 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 15.3
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 435 432 429 432 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 455
Mixed 436
SusWrite 437
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 39.5
148% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 312
228% 298 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 313%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
222GB free
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 149 141 135 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 429
Write 322
Mixed 277
SusWrite 174
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 14.3
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 32.2
43% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 55%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
189GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1941 538 249 249 271 228 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,249
Write 1,790
Mixed 1,486
SusWrite 579
288% 1,276 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 68.1
236% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 620
452% 593 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 184%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386B4G70DM0-CMA4 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback