HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 670
66% 541 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 91.3
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 83.7
74% 88.3 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 80.2
Splatting 73.2
71% 88.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2248 2113 1531 1520 1516 1530 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,571
SusWrite 1743
414% 1,840 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 72.6
241% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 656
480% 636 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 292%
Great: 410%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 912GB
551GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 392 428 368 396 366 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 957
Write 411
Mixed 427
SusWrite 390
121% 546 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 23.5
81% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 202
164% 236 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 146%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
465GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 119 120 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 120
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 80 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 83.1
Write 81.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 78.4
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF HMA41GR7AFR8N-TF 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 41.5
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback