TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 05:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 221
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 639
68% 541 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 78.9%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 C580)
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 94.6
50% 73.6 fps
MRender 60.5
Gravity 69
Splatting 47.3
47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 49.1%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 1TB
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA051R21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 413 402 404 400 381 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 411
Mixed 380
SusWrite 401
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 46.7
156% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 282
219% 298 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 111%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: DA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 160 166 166 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 180
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 168
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
33GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX2666C16/8G Crucial CB8GU2400.C8D Crucial CB8GU2400.C8D 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 78.6%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,083x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples935x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples395x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples341x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples302x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples247x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples153x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples120x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples113x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples374x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples342x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples266x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback