Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 03:50
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 261
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 935
87% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,413
88% 1,413 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 187
Parallax 180
141% 180 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 181
Splatting 127
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
528GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 1413 411 205 194 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,458
Write 1,382
Mixed 1,361
SusWrite 661
273% 1,216 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 48.9
165% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 892
DQ Write 61.6
DQ Mixed 144
189% 366 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 171%
Great: 365%
Adata SU650 960GB
165GB free
Firmware: Q1122BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 58 360 388 178 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 488
Write 372
Mixed 304
SusWrite 242
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 21.2
69% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 72.9
75% 129 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 57 63 63 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 125
Write 47.5
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 58.9
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 110%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
28GB free, PID null, Ultra
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 20 27 35 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 120
Write 21.9
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 25.6
52% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.7
244% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 56
MC Write 56.8
MC Mixed 50.1
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 23.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 137%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $605
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback