HP 21-2010la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 21-2010la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B31
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 17:53
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 47.3
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 53.8
28% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 104
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 202 216 219 287 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 430
Write 365
Mixed 348
SusWrite 244
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 18.3
72% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 101
89% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 102%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.4 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4
7% 4.93 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 21-2010la Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 21-2010la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback