Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130416
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 13:23
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 402
49% 376 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gainward(10B0 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 23.8
19% 22.6 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 19
19% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 425 423 433 431 410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 425
Mixed 394
SusWrite 417
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 62.3
202% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Adata SP900 64GB
1GB free
Firmware: 5.0.Be
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 94
Write 70.1
Mixed 88
19% 84 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 16.4
92% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 56.1
DQ Write 52.1
DQ Mixed 54.5
41% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 62%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB
42GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 52 60 70 65 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 88
Write 85.4
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 64.2
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 96%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB
56GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 52 61 69 65 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 186
Write 112
Mixed 83
SusWrite 64.7
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-D3H-CF - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback