Lenovo 20M9CTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20M9CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20M9CTO1WW
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 02:44
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 731
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 7.3
5% 15 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,534
Write 2,331
Mixed 1,230
450% 2,031 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 83.5
278% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 958
723% 975 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
69GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 86 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 84.7
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 82%
ST2000LX001-1RG1 2TB
1TB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 109 108 109 106 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 91
Write 98.8
Mixed 79
SusWrite 106
129% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20M9CTO1WW Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 20M9CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback