HP ZBook 15 G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8275
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180129
Uptime24 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 07:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 190
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 541
57% 455 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8275) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 35.9
Parallax 7.5
5% 16.5 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,667
Write 1,021
Mixed 699
248% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 48.7
171% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 565
427% 574 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
910GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 136 136 136 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
65% Good
Read 91.3
Write 110
Mixed 55
SusWrite 135
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A2K43CB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G4 Builds (Compare 869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback