Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EAY_X413EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EAY_X413EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X421EAY
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 11:16
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 268
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 634
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1462) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 24.2
16% 21.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 209 141 142 139 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,529
Write 908
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 202
203% 916 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 71.8
280% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 567
491% 716 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 194%
Great: 171%
JetFlash TS32GJF700 32GB
22GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 33 36 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 22.7
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 35.4
38% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.4
250% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 17
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EAY_X413EA Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EAY_X413EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback