MSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A82
MotherboardMSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170421
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 23:43
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 361
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 243
Reflection 228
Parallax 233
198% 235 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 174
Splatting 143
92% 106 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 150%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 146 62 90 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 716
Write 521
Mixed 443
SusWrite 167
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 52.7
182% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 273
321% 551 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 126%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GIS 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH3 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82) Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M-A PRO M2 (MS-7A82)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback