Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration654 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 64.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 874
84% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 37.3
29% 37.4 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 26.5
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 1162 1153 282 56 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,436
Write 1,100
Mixed 976
SusWrite 655
233% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 57.4
197% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 244
219% 348 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 176%
Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
241GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 430 426 412 437 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 417
Mixed 414
SusWrite 427
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 43.7
145% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 209
163% 232 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MN05ACA800 8TB
737GB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 200 203 195 205 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 204
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 200
128% 176 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.9
290% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 117%
Great: 136%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
1.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 112 117 116 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 114
69% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 112%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250
952GB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 193 188 190 198 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 180
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 186
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.4% Good
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 18.8
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 11.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback