Razer Blade

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 74%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190220
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 08:53
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 218
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 637
67% 534 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 94.9
Parallax 7.9
6% 36.5 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 681 398 387 440 427 405 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 1,087
Write 1118
Mixed 536
SusWrite 456
179% 799 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 2.4
89% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 102
64% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 70%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback