Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA560
Memory42.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 250
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 621
63% 511 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 115
Parallax 104
90% 110 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 80.8
79% 99 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1790 1347 1206 896 759 825 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 805
Write 753
Mixed 712
SusWrite 1,137
193% 852 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 78.7
250% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 865
653% 880 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 219%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD M471A2K43CB1-CTD 47GB
2667, 2667 MHz
32767, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.5
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback