Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA560
Memory42.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 22:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 259
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 623
66% 525 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2012) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 117
Parallax 108
92% 112 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 82.6
81% 102 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2006 2038 2066 2069 2088 2101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,086
Write 2,076
Mixed 1,764
SusWrite 2,062
450% 1,997 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 79.9
259% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 905
681% 917 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 331%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD M471A2K43CB1-CTD 47GB
2667, 2667 MHz
32767, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 26
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback