Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory	56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180628
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '22 at 13:50
Run Duration	418 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 194 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 567 59% 472 Pts	64-Core 745 46% 745 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 1TB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 852GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0929A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 299 295 296 298 296 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 321 Write 263 Mixed 254 SusWrite 295 64% 283 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 14.9 81% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 17.7 27% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 100%
Intenso SATAIII 1TB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 886GB free Firmware: 9A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 231 230 230 230 230 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.7% Good	Read 259 Write 238 Mixed 233 SusWrite 230 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 23.6 112% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 41.9 62% 115 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 100%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$49 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 931GB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 151 151 151 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 145 Write 132 Mixed 114 SusWrite 150 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 171 170 171 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 160 Mixed 106 SusWrite 170 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4A HMT31GR7EFR4A HMT31GR7CFR4A HMT31GR7EFR4A HMT31GR7EFR4A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT31GR7EFR4A H... 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 32.5 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M730power Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	7x
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	6x
Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	5x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	5x
SATAIII 1TBIntensoBench 76%, 294 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
HMT31GR7EFR4C 4x8GBHynixBench 101%, 53 samples	4x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 29 samples	2x
HMT31GR7EFR4C 8x8GBHynixBench 106%, 28 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $1,204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16