Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M730power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 15:18
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 197
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 566
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 745
46% 745 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B57) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 39.6
34% 41.7 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 34.6
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 1TB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 298 316 315 290 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 326
Write 266
Mixed 255
SusWrite 302
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 13
80% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 17.8
27% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 100%
Intenso SATAIII 1TB
886GB free
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 228 230 233 226 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 241
Write 222
Mixed 218
SusWrite 230
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 21.2
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 43.3
62% 116 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 100%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
931GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 148 151 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 154
Write 118
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 149
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 170 171 171 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 159
Mixed 106
SusWrite 170
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4A HMT31GR7EFR4A HMT31GR7CFR4A HMT31GR7EFR4A HMT31GR7EFR4A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- HMT31GR7EFR4A H... 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89% Excellent
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 33.4
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 89%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M730power Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $1,204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback