Alienware Aurora R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora R5  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 01NYPT
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171213
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 04:23
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 87.4
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 146
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 184
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Dell(1028 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.7% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 59.8
46% 61.5 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 53.3
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$54
364GB free
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 437 377 405 425 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,131
Write 1302
Mixed 1,025
SusWrite 440
219% 975 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 50.6
173% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 487
388% 546 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 151%
Great: 311%
Adata SD600Q 240GB
30GB free
Firmware: 9304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 258 268 266 272 265 MB/s
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 229
Write 240
Mixed 240
SusWrite 264
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 16.3
57% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 162
121% 159 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 49 33 43 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 68
SusWrite 63.3
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 112%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB
15GB free, PID 00d2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 10 67 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 72
Write 64.7
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 62.5
83% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
69% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 43%
USB DISK 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID ffff
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.7 4.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.4
8% 7.03 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R5 Builds (Compare 1,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $312
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback