Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 15:08
Run Duration411 Seconds
Run User MOZ-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 245
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 498
66% 495 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 78 64 65 68 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 446
Write 271
Mixed 314
SusWrite 102
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 19.9
60% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 44.7
46% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
322GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 100 99 101 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 93.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 100
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback