Arcelik GNB 1577 V1 i7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemArcelik GNB 1577 V1 i7  (all builds)
MotherboardARCELIK GNB 1577 V1 i7
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160105
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 159
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 217
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Device(1B0A 2281) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7122
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
9.83% Terrible
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 11
Parallax 11.2
11% 11.8 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 14
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.83%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Hf10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 71 70 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60% Good
Read 417
Write 272
Mixed 218
SusWrite 91.7
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 7.2
96% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 92.6
114% 199 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GCZ.AU30C 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GNB 1577 V1 i7 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik GNB 1577 V1 i7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback