Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FL
Memory14.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 17:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 224
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 302
34% 269 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 1FBE) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 13.6
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.3
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ3 512GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 198 246 125 126 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 359
Write 682
Mixed 528
SusWrite 182
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 19
97% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 304
257% 366 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 150%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback