Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FL
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 12:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 94.2
54% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 140
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 97.2
6% 97.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 1FBE) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.8
16% 18.9 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 17
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ3 512GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 141 124 137 221 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 742
Write 819
Mixed 686
SusWrite 204
138% 613 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 40.6
113% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 261
213% 308 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 150%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2666C15S4/16G 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FL_R564FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback