CMS 7200-5704A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCMS 7200-5704A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B460-PLUS
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 05:26
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 255
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 831
83% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 246
Parallax 271
227% 265 fps
MRender 310
Gravity 232
Splatting 170
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 191%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1385 817 827 840 841 839 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,571
Write 1764
Mixed 1,423
SusWrite 925
320% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 73.1
263% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 943
708% 960 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 243%
Great: 276%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
31GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 82 84 84 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 318
Write 103
Mixed 119
SusWrite 85.3
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 21.3
67% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 50.1
DQ Mixed 66.3
61% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 96%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
66GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 355 355 305 139 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 331
Write 371
Mixed 330
SusWrite 268
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 27.5
88% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 192
141% 185 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 196 197 198 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 179
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 197
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4BL.M8FB1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5704A Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: CMS 7200-5704A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback