HP 110-216ix

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 110-216ix  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AFB
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 07:21
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 119
54% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 197
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 2AFB) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2112XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 215 222 223 188 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 252
Write 224
Mixed 207
SusWrite 196
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 22.7
77% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 67.1
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 105
86% 118 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 93%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
310GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 79
Write 77.9
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 92.2
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 110-216ix Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 110-216ix

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback