Asrock X300M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X300M-STX  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210701
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 00:57
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 201
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 392
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.82% Terrible
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 15.6
10% 11.7 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasfor ce SSD 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 315 339 307 299 313 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 394
Write 296
Mixed 265
SusWrite 312
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 12.2
64% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 21.1
56% 113 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 85%
Patriot Spark 256GB
201GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 71 72 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 350
Write 302
Mixed 263
SusWrite 109
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 20.6
86% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 176
149% 216 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57%
Great: 85%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
712GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 87 60 57 55 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.17% Terrible
Read 76.5
Write 76.8
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 63.1
16% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
4% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 28.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X300M-STX Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock X300M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback