MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SCXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 208
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 623
67% 531 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 42.1
24% 34 fps
MRender 52.3
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 40.5
36% 44.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 301 305 305 290 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 978
Write 1,135
Mixed 948
SusWrite 433
197% 873 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 70.6
243% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 916
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 842
625% 830 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 177%
Great: 211%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
907GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 397 391 376 375 371 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 356
Mixed 337
SusWrite 391
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 52.2
168% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 2,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback