Medion MS-7707

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMedion MS-7707  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7707
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '17 at 14:18
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 92.6
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 152
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 150
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330
MSI(1462 1862) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 2.38
4% 4.77 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 4.09
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 108
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.22
70% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7707 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7707

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback