Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210329
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '22 at 13:21
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Memory 89 1-Core 147 2-Core 285 95% 174 Pts	4-Core 567 8-Core 953 93% 760 Pts	64-Core 1,467 91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.27 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 500 Write 462 Mixed 361 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 54 184% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 224 208% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$152 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 914GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1019 1025 1051 1059 1058 1060 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 1,393 Write 1,085 Mixed 1,139 SusWrite 1,045 262% 1,166 MB/s	4K Read 68.1 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 94.3 311% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,432 DQ Write 1,162 DQ Mixed 1,244 945% 1,279 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 372%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 540GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 86 88 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 75.4 Write 134 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 85.4 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.7 209% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 71%
Generic External 80GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 64GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 39.4 Write 37.5 Mixed 28 SusWrite 40.8 49% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 20%
778 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 11GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 138 Write 23.7 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 24.6 49% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 112% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 34GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 45 27 25 20 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 135 Write 67.4 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 34.1 93% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3 200% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 39%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 64GB 563 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 58GB free, PID 7722 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 17 21 16 18 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 90.2 Write 15.4 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 16.2 34% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 44% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GB 2,947 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 41.1 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.6 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 39.8 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	88x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	61x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	45x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $965

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)