Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín, 3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 00:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 721
64% 542 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D700 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 0127) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.45.40.10
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 52.7
28% 39.2 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 21.6
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 321 320 321 321 317 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 313
Write 320
Mixed 311
SusWrite 320
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 30.5
98% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 155
110% 138 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343531553742465238432D52442020 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 37.1
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback