Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín, 3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 23:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 717
66% 551 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D700 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 0127) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 53.1
26% 38.7 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 21.5
24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 324 327 328 328 328 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 312
Write 324
Mixed 313
SusWrite 327
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 35.9
119% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 168
119% 151 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343531553742465238432D52442020 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 37.6
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback