Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '19 at 01:11
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 476
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.33
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
22.9% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 34.8
23% 29.7 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 30.5
22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM1024G PCIe 1TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1081 1126 1122 1097 1119 1112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,349
Write 1,070
Mixed 786
SusWrite 1,110
242% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 50.5
163% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 537
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 536
380% 486 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 193%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343531553742465238432D52442020 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 33.3
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 8.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback