Asus H61M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H61M-D  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 21:38
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 169
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 309
43% 316 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 83.3
50% 68.7 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 46
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 97GB
57GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
Read 98.3
Write 13.7
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 12.4
8% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 11.7
38% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 2.7
DQ Mixed 2.9
4% 9.2 MB/s
CGM Virtual Disk 37910 500GB
105GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 22 12 13 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
Read 95.2
Write 12.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 14.8
8% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 11.7
38% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 2.7
DQ Mixed 3.6
5% 9.37 MB/s
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 12TB
4TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 14 15 16 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.4% Very poor
Read 94.9
Write 14.2
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 15.2
8% 38 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 11.5
35% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 2.2
DQ Mixed 2.9
4% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-D Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback