Biostar B365MHC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive12.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar B365MHC  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 08:56
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 118
2-Core 242
81% 180 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 910
84% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 74% Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Nvidia(10DE 13A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 165
Parallax 167
137% 167 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 144
Splatting 124
119% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 0001 107GB
59GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 19 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 93.4
Write 23.4
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 20.4
10% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 5.8
23% 9.17 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 10.1
9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 21%
CGM Virtual Disk 35606 12TB
3TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 22 23 23 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11% Very poor
Read 49.3
Write 31.8
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 21.2
8% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 6.2
23% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 8.1
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 10.3
9% 12.4 MB/s
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 12TB
1.5TB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 23 24 22 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 92.1
Write 33.6
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 22.5
11% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 6
23% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 8.1
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 10.5
9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 16%
CGM Virtual Disk 41238 1TB
654GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 24 28 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.4% Very poor
Read 86.5
Write 38.1
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 24.7
11% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 5.8
22% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 10.7
9% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 23.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 4.9
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 635
6% 635 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365MHC Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar B365MHC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback